...and I wish I'd never thrown an iota of support towards the Red side of the US political spectrum in my life.
But I find myself, even after contemplation and reading a surprisingly high number of supportive posts by reasonably sensible Blue-leaning people, thinking the Peace Prize win is just absurd.
Or, if that's irksome, let's call it premature. Let's make a deal - if Obama were to do at least two of these actions:
1) Withdraw from Iraq. This includes removing all troops and not constantly air-striking random people near suspected terrorists. This is not satisfied by a constantly sliding withdrawal date.
2) Withdraw from Afghanistan, same conditions.
3) Allow independent verification that prisoners of the US are being treated in accordance with Geneva convention requirements for prisoners of war. The current pinky-swearing doesn't count.
4) Achieve a diplomatic equilibrium with Iran that doesn't involve the US constantly threatening to sanction, air-strike, or possibly invade Iran because they're possibly pursuing the capability to build nuclear weapon.
...then I'll say, yeah, there's been enough of a shockingly genuine break from the policies of the past to be recognized on the level of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Fair?
(And yes, I recognize the Prize as awarded is influenced far less than by work for peace and human rights than by "making people in Europe feel hopeful" - hence folks like Kissinger, Arafat, etc. get the award when their press is good while empire-undermining folks like Gandhi get snubbed. Now, no offense folks in Europe, but you're a damn sight less likely to get blown up by a Predator drone or a MOAB than people in other parts of the world. I submit that it isn't about you guys feel.)




